Articles

Meraki MR28 Vs MR36: Features, Performance & Value Comparison

John Ciarlone John Ciarlone
6 minute read

Choosing the right wireless access point can make or break the user experience across your entire network. With more devices connecting from more locations, IT teams need gear that keeps up, without becoming a management headache. That’s where Cisco Meraki’s MR28 vs MR36 cloud-managed lineup shines.

This guide breaks down the MR28 vs MR36 access points, two popular options in the Meraki family. We’ll walk you through their specs, performance benchmarks, deployment tips, and help you decide which one best fits your environment. Whether you’re scaling up or sticking to the basics, this comparison can help you move forward with clarity.

A Quick Overview Of Meraki MR28 vs MR36

When you’re choosing access points for your network, every spec and feature counts. Cisco Meraki’s MR28 and MR36 are both Wi-Fi 6-ready access points designed for simplicity and cloud control; however, they serve different needs. Here’s what you’re working with:

Meraki MR28

The MR28 is an entry-level Wi-Fi 6 access point designed for basic coverage needs. It’s budget-friendly, cloud-managed, and ideal for low-density environments, such as small offices or satellite branches. You get enterprise-grade security and Meraki simplicity, without the higher-end performance specs.

It’s especially useful for organizations that want secure wireless without the bells and whistles. If your staff isn’t pushing high-throughput applications and you don’t expect massive growth in device count, the MR28 is a reliable pick that delivers value without overbuying.

Meraki MR36

The MR36 steps things up. This is a Wi-Fi 6 access point made for modern networks with high client density and throughput demands. It supports more users, offers faster uplinks, and delivers advanced RF performance, all with the same Meraki dashboard control and security standards.

Think of it as the go-to model for expanding IT environments. Whether you’re outfitting a school, healthcare facility, or midsize office with heavy traffic, the MR36 has the scalability and feature set to support it. It’s built for more than just today’s traffic — it’s ready for what’s next.

A Detailed Comparison Of Technical Specifications

Here’s how the MR28 and MR36 stack up on paper:

Specification

MR28

MR36

Wireless Standard

Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)

Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)

Frequency Bands

2.4 GHz / 5 GHz

2.4 GHz / 5 GHz

Maximum Throughput

1.7 Gbps

1.7 Gbps

Antenna Type

Integrated

Integrated

Radio Configuration

2x2:2

2x2:2

Maximum Clients

~100

~256

Power Over Ethernet (PoE)

802.3af

802.3at

Management Platform

Meraki Dashboard

Meraki Dashboard

Security Features

WPA3, Air Marshal

WPA3, Air Marshal

USB Port

No

Yes

Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)

No

Yes

Multi-Gigabit Ethernet Port

No

Yes (1 GbE/2.5 GbE)

Mesh Support

Yes

Yes

Dimensions

Compact

Compact

Environmental Range

Commercial Indoor Use

Commercial Indoor Use

What stands out: The MR36 offers better client support, has a multi-gigabit port, and includes BLE and USB, making it more flexible and future-proof for demanding deployments.

The multi-gig port alone makes it a smart choice for offices that expect bandwidth-intensive activities, such as 4K conferencing, cloud backups, or real-time collaboration. BLE also opens up integration with IoT devices, which the MR28 simply doesn’t support.

Key Benchmarks For Performance And Capacity

When it comes to real-world usage, here’s where the MR28 and MR36 diverge:

Metric

MR28

MR36

Client Density Performance

Low to moderate

High-density environments

Throughput Under Load

Moderate

Strong

Uplink Speed Capacity

1 Gbps

2.5 Gbps

Deployment Scale Suitability

Small branches/offices

Large offices, classrooms, and clinics

Power Budget & Efficiency

Lower power draw

Higher PoE draw but more capacity

Latency

Acceptable for standard tasks

Optimized for video/voice traffic

The MR36 clearly leads in uplink capacity and user load handling. If you’ve got a network with heavy traffic, high concurrency, or VoIP/video reliance, MR36 delivers the performance you need.

Performance under load is one of the most critical factors for modern environments. You don’t want an AP to buckle when 30 or more people are on a Zoom call. The MR36 not only handles the load but also maintains stability and consistent QoS.

How To Deploy Meraki Access Points Effectively

No matter which model you choose, proper deployment makes all the difference. Here’s how to get the most out of your Meraki APs:

  • Run a wireless site survey before installation.

  • Mount access points on open, centrally located ceilings.

  • Avoid channel overlap, especially on the 2.4 GHz band.

  • Enable band steering to direct clients to the 5 GHz band.

  • Use Meraki’s Auto RF (Radio Resource Management).

  • Set transmit power based on the environment size and materials.

  • Only assign static channels if Auto RF needs help.

  • Use WPA3 or WPA2-Enterprise for secure access.

  • Test connectivity and throughput after setup.

  • Monitor everything from the Meraki dashboard.

Even high-performance gear won’t save you from poor placement. Mounting too close to walls or HVAC equipment can cripple your signal. Always test and validate after install. And keep an eye on usage reports inside the dashboard to spot trouble before it becomes a user complaint.

Important Considerations Before Choosing An Access Point

Choosing between MR28 and MR36 isn’t about better vs worse, it’s about what your network needs. Here’s what to evaluate:

Performance And Throughput Requirements

Do you just need basic Wi-Fi, or are you supporting dozens (or hundreds) of users per access point? For high-throughput needs, MR36 is the better fit.

If your network leans heavily on cloud tools, video, or shared documents, you’ll hit the MR28’s ceiling quickly. MR36 provides you with room to grow without requiring a forklift upgrade later.

Support and Compatibility

The MR36 offers better hardware for future upgrades and handles advanced device requirements more efficiently, such as multi-gig and BLE peripherals.

You also get better upstream support from Cisco for the MR36, especially as environments trend toward hybrid work and smart building integrations. If future-proofing matters, it’s the safer bet.

Security Features

Both models come with Meraki’s cloud-managed security, including WPA3, content filtering, and Air Marshal. However, if you require physical expandability or Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) for smart integrations, the MR36 offers additional options.

Additionally, the MR36 can handle more encrypted traffic without compromising performance. For compliance-heavy environments, it gives you more breathing room.

Full Deployment Cost

MR28 wins on cost-per-unit, but MR36 can reduce the number of APs needed in a dense space. Think total network ROI, not just sticker price.

Over-deploying MR28s solely to meet demand may be more costly than a well-planned MR36 rollout. Factor in licensing, switch port capacity, and long-term upgrade cycles when making a decision.

Upgrade Your Network Performance With The Right Access Point

If you’re running a small branch with low client demand, the MR28 gets the job done without overkill. But if you’re scaling up, supporting hybrid teams, or building high-capacity Wi-Fi that just works, the MR36 is worth every penny. Both are solid. The right choice ultimately depends on network size, performance expectations, and future growth potential.

Think strategically. Don’t let budget drive the entire conversation. Build for the load you expect, and give your team the tools they need to work fast and stay connected.

Not sure which access point is right for you? Browse our MR28 and MR36 selections to find the ideal fit for your needs.

« Back to Articles